Writing Center Philosophy
The philosophy of the writing center
focuses on different
ways of making knowledge (Hobson, 1994). It
also encourages us to work with students at their own rate so that they become
better writers. If we nurture and facilitate them according to this assumption,
students will be able to recognize their own errors (Clark, 1990).
Writing Center
Pedagogy
Writing center pedagogy is one
of the important aspects of the writing center work and identity. It is
an idea to offer the commitment for teaching writing in multiple spaces and
create positive writing learning opportunities through tutors’ professional
development (Jackson &
McKinney, 2012).
Writing Center
Theory & Practice
Writing Center Theory and Practice (Hobson, 1994; Corbett, 2013) is
a combination of multiple theories from multiple disciplinary writing
practices. The idea of the writing center as
a physical space is moving towards the space of theoretical and practical
perspectives of the writing center (Corbett, 2013). Historically, the Writing Center theory and practice
was related to the practice of error correction in students’ papers. There is no single
theory that can accommodate diverse writing needs of multidisciplinary writers. However, tutors
must know both Writing Center theory and practice to study and critique these
inconsistencies. Sometimes, tutors feel guilty about being more interested in
the practice of writing center work than its theory. Tutor need to continue to
understand, value, and critique, recognize and advertise the credibility of
knowledge. Moreover, writing center practitioners need to share
their experiences for fostering writing center communities and admit every
tutor’s reflection for shaping a new writing center theory and practices (Hughes,
1991).
Writing Center
Tutoring Pedagogy or Instruction
Writing Center
Tutoring pedagogy (Harris & Silva, 1993) refers to the commitment of
facilitating for becoming better writers, not better writing and creating
writing knowledge during the tutorial session in the writing center. Writing
tutors have the responsibility of prioritizing writing issues or errors in the writing draft
through searching for the well written sentence, acknowledging the strength of
the paper in the first few minutes of the tutorial session, discussing only two
or three concerns, and suggesting writing tools for developing writing
processes. The main vision of the writing tutorial pedagogy is to provide
a descriptive feedback for every writer (Nakamaru, 2010).
Writing Center Evaluation
Writing Center Evaluation is the
process of collecting and interpreting data to communicate writing center work
effectively (Bell, 2000).
It emphasizes on the meaningful self
evaluation processes for advancing future writing center practices. Writing center practitioners
must not involve decision maker in evaluation who are not knowledgeable about
writing center research, process, pedagogy, and policy.
Writing Center
Research
Writing Center Research is the
systematic process of exploring information on the overall writing center
knowledge making processes. Researching in writing
center can offer a deeper understanding about students’ writing processes and
development; and enrich pedagogies for facilitating writing processes. Most
importantly, the primary elements of writing center research: 1) writing center
as a site, 2) writing center’s practice, 3) writing center’s research methods,
such as empirical, ethnographic, theoretical, and practitioner inquiry (Gillespie,
Gillam, Brown, & Stay, 2002).
Writing Center
Community
Writing Center Community is a group of writing center
practitioners, who have the common goal for making knowledge about writing
center community (Liggett, et al 2011). Liggett et al (2011) offer a theory or
taxonomy of methodologies for the writing center how the writing center
community makes knowledge that would help us to reflect ourselves as
researchers.
Writing Tool
Writing Tool is an instrument
for both student and tutor to facilitate writing processes during the tutoring
session. It is useful for planning, brainstorming, and clarifying the steps of
the writing process to fulfill specific academic writing requirements. De Smet,
Brand-Growel, Leijten and Kirschner (2014) suggested that the use of the
electronic outlining was helpful for students to improve their planning and
writing communication processes in argumentative text structure. Their
performances in writing fluency were improved due to the repeated practice of
the writing tool, electronic outlining.
No comments:
Post a Comment